A quick check of the SkySentinel camera detections on Saturday night (the 18th) showed this bolide well to the west of the PTO. I checked the American Meteor Society web page the next morning and the fireball log showed an event (AMS 688-2017) at the approximate time with a list of 70+ reported observations. I am still working on posting my detections on the AMS video page, but am having problems. I think the problem is with the format of the videos created by the SkySentinel application.
The SkySentinel camera captured a bolide Monday morning just after 0200. Eight people reported the event on the American Meteor Society web site. Several reported it fragmented, but it must have done that after it hit my treeline.
This image shows the first bright sky meteor that the Sky Sentinel meteor camera detected. I normally disable the camera during daylight hours. This cuts down on the camera detecting birds, insects and aircraft. This morning (20 Jan), just before detection was disabled, the camera recorded this very bright meteor in the dawning sky.
Every year the Earth passes through the debris strewn orbit of comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle. On average, meteors can be attributed to the comet from July 13th to August 26th. Across that time span the count will slowly increase, peak, then slowly drop off. For 2013, Earth was predicted to cross the center of the stream at 1200(L) on Monday the 12th of August. That timing was optimum for eastern Asia. The best time for North American viewing was the morning of the 12th of August and detections by the NMSU All-Sky camera verify that prediction. A video of each detection is posted on the NMSU web page for the PTO. As would be expected, a couple of detections were sporadic meteors, but very few.
NOTE: The meteor video taken at 09:04:51.809(Z) on the 13th was triggered by passing car lights. Within the recorded window is a dim meteor. It is a good indication on how bright the meteor has to be to trigger the software.
The Pear Tree Observatory now has two meteor cameras standing watch. Our first camera, a Moonglow All-Sky camera, has been up and running since July of 2011. That camera is my go-to view of the sky during observing sessions. In the image below you can identify quite a few constellations and you can just make out the Milky Way. But as with all things there are trade-offs. In order to get an image that detailed the camera controller is designed to lengthen the exposure as the sky darkens. When the sky is as dark as it gets around here, the image update rate looks to be about a second and a half. And, as you can see, a lot can happen in that time. The meteor only shows up in one update of the video image.
Since the meteor is only in one image its direction of motion cannot be determined. And in fact, can be misleading. In the video, the meteor appears to move from right to left. As the single image with the meteor is scanned on to the screen (from top to bottom) the right edge of the trail is first to be drawn. As the rest of the meteor trail is filled in, it appears to move to the left as the scanning proceeds down the frame.
Enter our new camera. While I was researching meteor cameras, I came across several organizations that sponsor meteor detection networks. New Mexico State University sponsors the All-Sky Camera Network. What started as a network of volunteer sites across the continental United States has now spread to several overseas sites as well.
The NMSU network web page has a map of their site locations and I couldn’t help but notice a gap over the panhandle of Florida. So in April of last year, I wrote to the listed contact. The response was there were no cameras currently on hand, but I could go on a waiting list should another batch be constructed. I said “Sign me up.” and in November received an email saying another batch of cameras was ready and was I still interested? A little more than a week later a box arrived with the camera and documentation inside.
It took me a while to construct the brackets necessary to mount the camera, and even more time matching the operating parameters to our sky conditions, but it is now operational. And based on the results of the recent Eta Aquarid meteor shower, it works very well. The system uploads each nights activity to a server at NMSU where the data are processed and cataloged. The videos are then posted on the web page. The PTO captures are posted here.
The only detection by the Moonglow camera was the single frame on the 6th of May shown above. As you can see from the archived videos on the NMSU web page their camera detected 5 meteors on the 6th, 7 on the 7th and 5 on the 8th.
But once again, compromises are made. The NMSU camera does not appear to lengthen its exposure time which means more frames are captured in the same time span. This also means that only the very brightest stars are visible and then just barely and the Milky Way is not visible at all. The video that matches the detection by the Moonglow camera shows the meteor travels left to right with a slight flare near the end.
Both cameras are valuable assets of the observatory. Each has been optimized for a specific task and both perform those tasks very well.